Your account is hiding winners.
You shipped 47 ads last quarter. You can name the 3 that worked. You can't see the ones you starved — the creatives that quietly beat your account average but never got the budget to scale. This finds them. You build it yourself with Claude, connected straight to your Meta account.
Join the waitlist →Performance lives in patterns. Your account already knows. You don't.
Your library has no memory
The brief you wrote in March didn't know your top hook in April. By June you forgot. By Q3 you're guessing again — and the winner you under-funded is still sitting in your account, invisible.
Tools store ads. They don't understand them.
Foreplay and Motion are $200–500/mo and they're a library. They don't rank every creative by true ROAS or tell you which under-funded ad deserves more spend this week.
A dashboard that finds your hidden gems
This product is the Meta connection method, the exact insight fields, and the hidden-gem scoring formula that builds a dashboard ranking every creative — and surfacing the under-funded winners. Build it with Claude. Own it.
The connection, the fields, the formula. You build the dashboard.
A no-code version that runs inside Claude via the Meta MCP (live in minutes), and the full owned web-app you build with Claude Code. Pick your speed.
Connects to your Meta ad account, pulls every creative with thumbnails and insights, and ranks them by real ROAS — phased so the build stays clean.
The scoring formula that finds creatives with low spend but above-average ROAS — the winners you starved. Tells you exactly which to scale this week.
The inverse: high-spend creatives quietly bleeding budget, plus live ads whose hook rate is dropping before CPMs tank.
Step-by-step to a Marketing API token, run-it-locally, and a one-click Vercel deploy. Plus the common API gotchas and their fixes.
Tools store ads. This understands them.
| Creative Dashboard | Foreplay / Motion | Meta Ad Library | Your agency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranks every creative by true ROAS | Yes | Manual | No | Reports CTR |
| Surfaces under-funded winners | Yes | No | No | No |
| You own it / your data | Yes | No | No | No |
| Cost | $397 once | $200–500/mo | Free | $5–25k/mo retainer |
Ten years running ads and 10+ of my own brands, $20M+ in creative testing — the most consistent waste I see is this: every brand starts each quarter as if the last didn't happen. Briefs ignore what won. The under-funded winner stays buried.
I built this for my own roster first. Now I'm packaging the exact build so you can run it on yours. The question I keep asking: why does the creative-memory problem cost the industry billions and nobody ships a fix you can own?
Not for everyone. Not built to be.
Built for you if
- You ship 5+ new ads/month
- You have 20+ creatives with history
- You make / approve the briefs
- You use Claude (or you'll start)
- You suspect you've under-funded winners
Not for you if
- You ship 1–2 ads a quarter
- You won't connect your Meta account
- You won't spend an hour building it
- You want a hosted SaaS someone else runs
- You want it to make the ads for you